Donald Trump & Co: Die juristische Aufarbeitung noch nie dagewesener Grenzüberschreitungen in über vier Jahren

Es ist wohl soweit :

New Yorker Staatsanwaltschaft erhebt Anklage gegen Trump

Gegen Ex-US-Präsident Trump gibt es etliche Vorwürfe. Einer davon: Er soll seine Firmenfinanzen je nach Bedarf kleiner oder größer gerechnet haben, um…

www.tagesschau.de

Link geht zu Tagesschau.de

Ist er schon verurteilt?

Nein, aber zumindest schon mal angeklagt. Und New York ist ja nun nicht Republikanisch, oder?

Zivilprozess? Warum gibt es da keinen normalen Prozess? Klingt doch nach Betrug.

Zitat von andro96

Damit lagen 57% der der abgegebenen Stimmen am Anfang dieses Fadens falsch

Naja, der Faden heißt: "Donald Trump & Co: Die juristische Aufarbeitung noch nie dagewesener Grenzüberschreitungen in über vier Jahren"

Liest sich nicht so als hätte die Anklage damit jetzt viel zu tun.

Früherer US-Präsident: Was die Anklage für Trump bedeuten könnte | tagesschau.de

Zitat

[...]

"Unsere Ermittlungen haben ergeben, dass Herr Trump, seine Kinder, die Trump Organisation über einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren mehr als 200 falsche und irreführende Bewertungen ihres Vermögens in ihren Bilanzen vorgenommen haben."

[...]

Viel Rauch um nichts, meint Kuby, der nicht in Verdacht steht, den Ex-Präsidenten zu unterstützen oder den Fall verharmlosen zu wollen. Doch so eine Anklage sei für den Immobilienmogul Trump nicht die erste. Er habe als Geschäftsführer seiner Holding zahlreiche davon kassiert: "Trump ist mehrfach verhört und angeklagt worden. Er hat die meisten Verfahren verloren. Er hat die Strafen gezahlt und gut. Und trotzdem ist er Präsident der USA geworden. In diesem Fall liegt viel weniger vor, als die Leute denken."

[...]

“What does Trump have on Judge Cannon?”: Experts stunned after judge overrules own special master

"Something is so off," ex-prosecutor says, "it is impossible not to ask this question in all seriousness."

www.salon.com

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday overruled the special master she appointed to review thousands of documents seized from Mar-a-Lago, shielding former President Donald Trump from addressing his claims that documents may have been "planted" or "declassified" in court.

Cannon, a Trump appointee in southern Florida, issued an order extending the timeline of the review after Trump's lawyers objected to the expedited schedule laid out by special master Raymond Dearie, who was chosen from a list proposed by Trump's lawyers. Under the new order, the review and any surrounding issues around Dearie's rulings "will almost certainly" stretch into next year, according to Politico.

Cannon, who has served on the bench for less than two years, also overruled Dearie, a Reagan appointee who has served for 36 years, on his requirement that Trump assert whether the FBI's inventory of seized items is accurate, effectively challenging his public claim that agents may have "planted" evidence.

.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Democrats ‘Have Already Started the Killings’ of Republicans

Greene added that President Joe Biden “has declared every freedom-loving American an enemy of the state.”

www.thedailybeast.com

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) accused Democrats of murdering Republicans in “killings” that the lawmaker claims are underway. “I am not going to mince words with you all,” Greene said at Donald Trump’s rally in Warren, Michigan, on Saturday night. “Democrats want Republicans dead, and they have already started the killings.” To support her claim, Greene cited a recent North Dakota crime story about an intoxicated man who allegedly “had a political argument with [a] pedestrian,” hit the pedestrian with a car, and then later claimed the pedestrian was “part of a Republican extremist group,” according to court documents. During her speech, Greene added that President Joe Biden “has declared every freedom-loving American an enemy of the state.” “But under Republicans, we will take back our country from the Communists who have stolen it and want us to disappear,” Greene concluded.

Diese Frau gehört wirklich weggesperrt.

The Supreme Court’s Big New Term

There is a feeling with this Court that the conservative Justices could make a landmark ruling out of almost any case.

www.newyorker.com

Yet there is a feeling that the conservative Justices could make a landmark ruling out of almost any case. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, the first case of the term, may seem to address a narrow questionthe definition of navigable watersbut it could become a vehicle for dismantling a wide range of regulations. Haaland v. Brackeen, a challenge to the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, could upend relations between the government and federally recognized tribes. The Court will also adjudicate a suit, brought by Texas and Louisiana, claiming that the Biden Administration has, in effect, broken the law by focussing its border-enforcement efforts only on certain categories of migrants, such as those deemed a threat to public safety. Notably, some Republicans have raised the possibility that, if the G.O.P. takes control of the House after the midterms, they may impeach President Biden on similar grounds.

The most explosive cases, however, may be the ones in which the Court will rule on how elections work. One of them, Merrill v. Milligan, will be heard on Tuesday. After the 2020 census, Alabama redrew its congressional districts; the new map, like the old one, has only one Black-majority district out of seven, in a state that is more than a quarter Black. Local civil-rights groups are challenging the map under the Voting Rights Act, but their chances seem dim. In 2013, Roberts wrote the majority opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, a case that significantly weakened the act, and there is concern that Merrill may finish it off. At Salve Regina, Kagan said, of the Justices mandate to protect voting rights, I dont think the Court has done this job particularly well.

Merrill may be a prelude to a case that could be even more destabilizing to American democracy: Moore v. Harper, for which the oral arguments have yet to be scheduled. Moore also involves congressional-district mapsthis time for North Carolina. After the states highest court threw out a gerrymandered map, Republican legislators appealed. The Supreme Court eventually took the case and agreed to consider a version of what is known as the independent state legislature theory, which holds that the power the Constitution grants state legislatures to organize elections cannot be limited by a states judiciary or constitutionor perhaps by much of anything. A broad decision in the case could make it far easier for state legislatures to engage in gerrymandering or voter suppression, or to intervene even more directly in the electoral process.

https://www.vanityfair.com/new…epublican-agenda-midterms

A quick guide to all the horrible things the GOP could do—abortion bans, social safety net gutting, impeachment—if it retakes both chambers.

Krass, wenn die die midterms gewinnen, dann können sie das Land nach Belieben umgestalten. Die GOP-Mehrheit im SC ist sowieso lächerlich.

Ich mach doch nicht extra nen USA-Thred auf und Trump ist für all das sowieso verantwortlich, ob direkt oder indirekt.

hihihihihihihi

Supreme Court temporarily blocks Congress from getting Trump income tax returns

The House Ways and Means Committee has sought federal income tax returns of Donald Trump from the IRS. The Supreme Court could now hear an appeal of the case.

www.cnbc.com

Was für ein shithole country. Das Haus werden die Dems ja verlieren, dazu der Supreme Court fest in konservativer Hand incl. eines schwachen Bidens. Jetzt als nächstes noch ein GOP-Präsident und das war es.